“It is a most miserable thing
to feel ashamed of home.” —Charles Dickens
One summer
evening in Brownsville, when I was twelve years old, my father took us to see
our house. For years, we were told about this place, bought with money saved
from working the fields. Before then, the first years of my life were lived on
the road, staying in other people’s places—a shanty trailer, a barracks, a onebedroom efficiency, or even the back of our car. But I never called any of them
home. My father spoke of this house as his sole reason for working the
migrant circuit my entire childhood. I was raised with the understanding that
all that intense back-breaking work equaled a charming, if not modest,
comfortable house. We paid for it, earned it, fulfilling our belief in The
American Dream. “There it is!” my father said with a wide toothy grin.
I smiled, too,
nodding my head with excitement. Although I was not exactly sure why.
During our
absence, my father rented our house to a couple who then turned it over to
squatters and drifters. The appeal of the house was gone, decimated by the wear
and tear of strangers. I remember the driveway crammed with cars, some
haphazardly parked on the dirt lawn, right up to the front porch. The screen
door was flung open and askew, so brittle it was barely hanging on for dear
life. Inside, the doors were replaced by bedsheets, wafting and billowing in
the stagnant air coming from the screenless windows. Sweat, cigarette smoke,
and cooking grease laced the walls while a heavy darkness settled in every
corner, making my new home seem more than just cavernous, but in decline and
ruin. Aghast, I walked out. My father stayed behind to talk to his tenants.
I sat in our
van and sulked, deceived by false expectations. I was upset that the amount of
hard work my parents put into those years of farm labor failed to match our
due. My anger rose from those dashed hopes for success. I cried at the
realization of what was actually there, yet another crappy place to live. A
house that would never truly be mine, one I’d never feel comfortable living in.
Was this exactly what we were working for?
I resigned to
reject it.
*
What
is a home if not a reflection of self?
*
A family sits
on an ornate couch. Behind them, a sprawling mansion with grand fawn-colored
walls adorned with greenery. To the left is a staircase with wide marble floor
and wrought-iron railing, the kind Norma Desmond descends from in Sunset
Boulevard. The staircase spirals past a massive window towards the manor’s
other wing.
The family
appears out of place, their faces captured in another time.
This
photograph is located at the end of a hallway at my parents’ house. I stumble
upon it randomly one day while snooping around. At first, I don’t recognize it.
The original was a smaller 5 x 7 photograph taken in 1992, unlike this new
iteration that’s been clearly Photoshopped (a bad job at that), blown up to
twice its size, and framed in golden bronze.
I do not know
the family in that photograph. I have never lived with such opulence or visible
privilege.
I am
fascinated by two things: what is being shown and how it is displayed. The
bronze frame introduces our altered family picture, hinting at a pattern I’ve
encountered throughout Mexican American culture in South Texas, an attraction
to an affluence that is unattainable as it is counterfeit.
What is being
declared in this photograph? The complete erasure of a family’s meager
beginnings.
*
Rags to riches.
One of the common running themes of the Mexican telenovela. Long thought of as
a government tactic used to distract or influence social and cultural behavior,
the telenovela of the 1970s and 1980s was not that far removed from its distant
cousin, the Hollywood soap opera. Both told stories through a skewed lens,
advocating certain ideals through implausible storylines that simultaneously
distorted and reflected a fractured cultural narrative. The telenovela conveyed
the aspirations of upward mobility of the working class, no matter the show’s
major plot. That mobility, be it social or cultural or both, meant the
protagonist, almost always an extremely attractive but lowly woman, is thrust
from poverty into the arms of rich aristocrat. But the telenovela, with its
escapist eye to melodrama, is always dead set against keeping their characters
apart—el amor prohibido—drawing a distinct line between high society and
lower class. The poor remain uneducated yet complacent, with the exception of
our humble protagonist who desires more from life. The aristocrats have it all,
but are cold and unhappy. The male protagonist seeks something real.
Love becomes the bond to their worlds; and in the end, against all odds, that
woman leaves behind her past life in the barrio, embracing the new one in a
mansion.
My earliest
recollection of watching telenovelas was at my grandparents’ house in
Brownsville. I was told to sit on the couch and not talk or move during this
time. I was more intrigued by my grandparents’ reactions to all the show’s
machinations than what was shown on screen. I compared their reactions with
those of my grandparents in Matamoros, Mexico, which were essentially the same.
No one seemed at all interested in acknowledging or contesting the preposterousness
of it all.
I was only six
years old, but I knew all of it was dumb, and a lie. What I missed was
understanding the influential grip of narrative power. Escapism can cast a most
bewitching spell. No wonder the telenovela is one of the most popular forms of
entertainment around the world. Skewed and fractured as that lens may be, the
form alters our semblance of self.
*
The kitchen
table is set, sopa de arroz steams across my face from a ceramic plate.
A plastic cup of Mexican Coke is placed next to me. I take a sip from my drink
and watch the drama unfold before me—my mother consoles her sister, Tia Lyla,
who is so upset her eyes welt with tears. Tia Lyla wipes her face with the hem
of her floral apron, then feigns a smile in my direction. When she looks back
at my mother, that smile languishes, the mournful gaze returns. It’s Juan, my
aunt says. Their brother, my uncle. He hasn’t called, he hasn’t written. The
mere thought of it all makes my aunt breakdown. She must take a seat. It seems
Tio Juan has forgotten them.
Tio Juan, the
successful businessman from Monterrey, Mexico, who I grew up knowing was the
only uncle on my Mexican side of the family to not fall prey to alcoholism and
became a licenciado. To be a licenciado is to have graduated both high
school and college, to have ascended to the upper-middle class. To be a
licenciado is to also have stature and privilege.
But Tia Lyla
is adamant that her brother has turned his back on his life, left the
bordertown barrio to live the quaint life in a two-story house in the suburbs
of Monterrey, because of esa mujer. That woman, my aunt.
For years, Tia
Yolanda was our family’s antagonist. Perhaps, a better term would be the family
“frenemy”, one to smile at in person, but scrutinize in private. Tia Yolanda was
said to be loca, off her rocker, and alleged to have “put things in his
head” that kept Tio Juan away from his family. The telenovela melodrama
suddenly comes alive without commercial break.
When I think
of Tia Yolanda now, I flinch at my childhood memory of her assessing her
children and nephews by the color of their skin. She’s not shy to report that
her prietitos—which includes my older brother, her eldest son and
myself—were “cute” dark-skinned boys, but nowhere near as wonderful or
exceptional as her two favorites: my other brother and her youngest daughter, los
gueritos, clearly the fairer-skinned in our family. I understood and hated
Tia Yolanda’s distinctions she set for us as children. But it introduced me to
Mexico’s deeply entrenched racism against the dark-skinned and the culture’s
elitist and classist structure.
If it was
shown on a television screen, then it was so in my family.
*
Classicism and
colorism bleed into the Borderlands and mimics Mexico’s colonial past. You see
it everywhere, in behavior, appearance, and expectations, sometimes even from
the humblest of persons. Don’t stay out in the sun, I heard my mother
tell me, or you’ll get too dark. Or Mijo, you’re looking very dark, said
with much dismay. Ingrained from childhood was the idea that the darker your
skin, the less privilege you deserved. A silly tenet coming from a family that
spent their life working in the sun, and descendants from people of the sun.
The main
protagonists on any telenovela are always fair-skinned, or white. Commoners are
always secondary characters, portrayed as the help, or as jesters for comic
relief. These jesters are always indigenous, Indios, who are
dark-skinned and not taken seriously. Even characters who desired and were
granted upward mobility through love, were always fairer skinned, and thus
worthy of moving away from squalor and into that sprawling mansion.
*
Photoshop
removes my past from its original setting—a dingy old trailer with cheap
wood-panel walls, drab monochrome window dressing, and my family sitting in a
living room occupied by a queen-sized bed—and replaces it with a lifestyle my
family has never known. Looking closer, I notice how awkwardly tacked on we are
to that ornate couch. For some reason, we don’t all fit into this couch and one
brother sits on what I assume is our immaculate marble floor.
I frown and
wonder why this photograph was ever doctored when the original seemed fine.
I pose this
question to my mother. She tells me that she just wanted a nice family
portrait for once. For her entire life, my mother always wanted a perfect
family picture, but she missed out on the 1980s trend of mothers dragging their
children to the photo studio at K-Mart or Sears. During that time, we were busy
picking fruit and saving money. But I can’t fathom my mother’s idea of a
“perfect” family portrait. The more I pry, the more uncomfortable I make her,
so I drop the subject.
*
In the
Southside of Brownsville each ramshackle house is a stronghold. Lions, angels,
and virgins stand like sentinels at the gates. “Sadly, no gargoyles,” I quip,
chuckling to myself as I drive to my parents’ house. On the way, I notice more
signs of pseudo affluence juxtaposed with reality. Elaborate fountains oddly
ensconced in yards covered with vehicles at various levels of disrepair. One
house has a mock baroque crystal chandelier with golden branches hanging from a
sagging porch. It’s hard to tell whether that’s the fixture’s proper place or
if it’s there temporarily, waiting to be set back at the center of a formal
entryway, which, I conclude, this house may actually have with all the add-on
rooms surging from its sides.
This last
observation reminds me that here, furniture is transformed into lavish signs of
wealth and privilege, no matter the backdrop. The formal dining table is not
used for eating but as a showcase of 17th or 18th century Spanish colonial design,
dripping with intricately carved scrolls and high gloss cherry sheen. In turn,
its chairs are less utilitarian and more of an effort to exhibit the gilded
floral print seat cushions. These tables are often covered in a clear plastic
and shoehorned into small eat-in kitchens. Windows take cue from Victorian
gowns, bloated damask with satin ruffles hang high on low walls, as if at any
moment, ready to float across a ballroom. Like the dining area, the main living
room is often smaller than the furnishing. An oversized couch set with ornately
carved waves that echo its patterned embroidery upholstery is wedged against itself.
Bureaus and china cabinets forfeit their use, becoming repositories for
marginalia.
*
We moved into
our house when I was thirteen. Despite our efforts at home improvements, I
never quite felt completely secure. Setting down roots is hard when your childhood
is built on displacement. To embrace ownership of a home, you must believe in
it, and I did not believe. My rejection was a reaction to those aspirations I
had maintained and believed in for my family and for myself. From their failure
grew a sense of shame that set me on a path to seek my own manhood, my own
independence. In a way, that shame changed everything.
César Díaz teaches creative nonfiction at St. Edward’s University in Austin, Texas. He is a featured columnist at Essay Daily. This piece is an excerpt from a collection of critical essays on South Texas culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment