Until A few
years ago, a new nonfiction anthology would mostly pop up in the form of a new
essay anthology every 5-10 years: Phillip Lopate’s, John Gross, Lydia
Fakundiny, Joseph Epstein, etc. Occasionally a how-to would come down the pike,
mostly focused on memoir. But we seem to have entered The Age of Nonfiction, at
least in the Academy, and there has been a spate of nonfiction anthologies
recently, several of them focused explicitly or implicitly on the essay. These
include Ned Stuckey-French and Carl Klaus’s Essayists on
the Essay, Nicole Walker and Margot Singer’s Bending Genre, Jill Talbot’s Metawritings:
Towards a Theory of Nonfiction, Dinty Moore’s The Rose Metal Press Field Guide to Writing Flash Nonfiction, Jeff Porter and Patricia
Foster’s Understanding the Essay and
my anthology Truth in Nonfiction and
forthcoming Essaying the Essay and After Montaigne, the last edited with
Patrick Madden. To add to this sudden cornucopia of anthological choices, one
can now buy actual books, it seems, that say “essay” on the cover. In fact some
people are now saying “essay” so much—“Essay, essay, essay!”—that it’s a bit of
delirium. It’s okay to say other things once in awhile.
When I was
starting out, back in the Nonfiction Pleistocene period, despite Phillip
Lopate’s bold gambit to bring the essay form more mainstream legitimacy, it was
considered box office poison (I like to compare myself to Katherine Hepburn
whenever possible) for a young writer to try to overtly publish a book of essays.
In fact, I think I can boldly say it just wasn’t done. Now, in fact, it is. And
this is a lovely thing. When I recently went back and forth with my editor
about whether to subtitle my new collection “Personal Essays” or “Essays” (she
heartily agreed to “Essays”), I thought this
is actual progress. Twenty years ago I would have been talking about
whether to call it memoir, or autobiography, or whitefish salad.
To return to
the point at hand, the question is, why now? To this I would say there are both
a reason and a large dose of fortuity. Have you ever had a large dose of
fortuity? It’s quite delicious. Nonfiction programs started gathering steam
over the past ten to fifteen years, fueled by a combination of Phillip Lopate
and other essayists apostolic literary zealotry, and the fact that nonfiction
was a clear area of possible growth in creative writing, which had maxed out
its fiction and poetry programs. But autobiographical writing also conveniently
matched the zeitgeist. The hangover from the seventies, which, as Woody Allen
might say of Scott and Zelda’s New Year’s Eve party, lasted a decade or two, and
encouraged self-exploration, while the internet, with its nonstop interpersonal
connections and sites for personal expression made everyone everywhere a
potential, and in fact immediate diarist, autobiographer, essayists manquée. In
short, out of the bog came the blog. David Shields has eloquently covered much
of this ground in his work: Reality TV, the need to self-perform, etc.
In short,
we’ve had the Perfect Nonfiction Storm, and this has made nonfiction and the
essay popular. But I don’t think it will last. At some point people will
probably start surfeiting on the details of life, and only half the population
will be writing blogs. Remember when everyone was tiring of memoirs a few years
ago? There were too many memoirs. Now we’re back to a memoir bubble. But there
are only so many interesting lives to go around. Memoirs aren’t for the
faint-hearted. It’s all in the writing. We’re headed for a memoir crash. Keep
your most valuable memoirs and sell the rest very soon.
I’m grateful
for the relative torrent of anthologies because I’m not sure that the tide of
nonfiction programs has been accompanied by all that much serious interest in
the form beyond its contemporary borders and boundaries. Taking myself out of
the equation, I think the ones listed above feature mostly serious writers
writing seriously. And they’re geared, I think for the MFA market and serious
literary nonfiction writers, so they should have significant shelf lives.
But what do I
know when it comes to prognostication? The Age of Nonfiction, like global
warming, may be here for longer than I think. Really, what do I know? Have I
heard that somewhere before?
*
David Lazar’s
books include Occasional Desire
(University of Nebraska Press), The Body of Brooklyn and Truth
in Nonfiction (both Iowa), Powder Town (Pecan
Grove), Michael Powell: Interviews and Conversations
with M.F.K. Fisher (both Mississippi). Forthcoming is Essaying
the Essay (Welcome Table Press) and After Montaigne, co-edited with Patrick Madden (University of
Georgia Press) He is the founding editor of the literary magazine Hotel
Amerika, now in its thirteenth year, which has featured groundbreaking
issues in transgeneric writing and the aphorism. He teaches at Columbia College
Chicago.
Thanks for the shout-out, but I need to offer a correction: I co-edited Essayists on the Essay with Carl Klaus.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the shout-out also, but my book is titled 'The Rose Metal Press Field Guide to Writing Flash Nonfiction,' not 'Dinty Moore’s Flash Guide to Writing Nonfiction.' Other than that, I love the heck out of this mini-essay. Thanks David.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAlso this!
ReplyDeleteThank you for this piece, David. It offers hope that I don't HAVE to write a memoir. I wrote my first essay in 1965 at age ten.I am still writing them, reading them and collecting them. Maybe it's my A.D.D.; maybe I just love small and shiny things. Essay writing brings to mind small perfect canvases with layers of words creating depth and texture-anthologies are the galleries that show them. Encouraging piece.
ReplyDelete