Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Patrick Madden, For the Last Time | L*STS

 


*

For the Last Time

Patrick Madden

*

L*STS: an Essay Daily Happening | About & Contents

 Lists | Lasts | Losts | Lusts | Other

*

The secret horrour of the last is inseparable from a thinking being whose life is limited. . . . When we have done any thing for the last time, we involuntarily reflect that a part of the days allotted us is past, and that as more is past there is less remaining. —Samuel Johnson, “On Last Things”

A few weeks ago, before attending an academic conference in Norwich, England, I took a week to see the sights of London. A considerable portion of my time was spent visiting the haunts of Great Dead essayists, men such as Oliver Goldsmith, Thomas De Quincey, Charles Lamb, and William Hazlitt. Rarely were the homes and churches emplaqued or otherwise noted. Aside from Joseph Addison, who is buried in Westminster Abbey, their graves were unprotected from the elements and mendicants such as myself. I tried halfheartedly to keep my antennae open to possibilities for writing, but I also just wanted to live like a tourist for a while, hoping that this would calm my nerves a bit, keep my mind off the long list of things I ought to have finished already, hold at bay the entropy that rushes up to take hold of my consciousness and drag it downward. It worked on that score; but like all such diversions, it lasted only as long as the traipsing about, and when I returned to real life, I felt again the abrumant weight of my responsibilities and obligations.
     So perhaps it’s no wonder that the story I grasped from my British wanderings is one of no consequence. What happened was I found my fly down after several hours of group tourism about the seaside at Southwold, the setting for parts of The Rings of Saturn by W. G. Sebald. The realization came in the subfloor men’s bathroom of the Elizabeth Fry Building at the University of East Anglia, during a break in the aforementioned conference. Mentally retracing my morning, I deduced that I must have left my pants unzipped from the moment I put them on (one leg at a time). I chuckled contentedly, half-worried that I’d exposed my white underwear or caused a colleague some momentary displaced embarrassment but half-pleased that I’d done it again. Nobody had asked me if I was afraid of heights. And I could not recall any untoward attentions or, worse, evasions, but how would I know? I zipped up, washed my hands, and returned to my day.
     I was left thinking, or am thinking now, about those events that punctuate the multivolume tome of our life, not with periods, not with question marks or exclamation points, but with commas, perhaps, or apostrophes, hyphens amid compound adjectives, colons before lists, the stuff that marks the way, making our reading make sense, workmanlike, by and large glossed over, unnoticed. How often are we stricken with hiccups? When will we need to clip our toenails again? When awaits us yet another crick in the neck? Or perhaps my mind is leaning toward the periods, the last times, farewells to small things, embarrassing things, things we should know better (or know better than to). When will we finally master our habits, overcome our shortcomings? Have we lost our keys for the last time? Can we be sure we won’t again leave our blinker on for miles and miles? Will we never again forget to take the garbage out to the curb? Have we seen the last of leaving our clothes in the washing machine until they mold or whatever it is that leaves us with stinkshirt, as my father calls it? What about the things we’ve very nearly mastered, like putting our shoes on the right feet or buttoning our shirt in proper correspondence? Can we ever be certain, even with advancing know-all technology to serve us, that we yet won’t leave our clocks unbacked or unforwarded? Or can we look forward to that amused discomfiture of showing up to church in the middle of the Mass before or after the one we’d intended to attend?
     This is the case with leaving my barn door open. I’ve done it often enough in the past—I know I have. Likewise, I expect I shall do it again. This is not the sort of mistake one learns from, not a sin one repents and forsakes. By its very nature, zipper negligence is unintentional and absentminded. And while I certainly have cultivated the habit of zipping up whenever I get dressed or finish at the urinal, my mind often wanders, so I can be almost certain that I will find my brageta abierta in the future. I have tried to resist the thought that invades my mind trailing this harmless event: that all is vanity, or life is futile, that despite our best efforts, we can never escape the small embarrassments we bring on ourselves as we struggle to keep track of it all, as we innocently ignore our vulnerabilities. What’s more, the older we get, the more likely we are to lose our fine-minded refinements, so the probabilities of oversights increase. And for all of that, we can never be sure that we’ve seen the last of such peccadilloes. It would be nice, in a way, to know when we’ve made our last little blunders, though there’s a charm in not knowing, too, a blissful ignorance that hides from us the ticking of the clock or the tallying of days and moments.
     Of course, at some point, known or unknown, each repeatable offense or harmless exercise must reach its final occurrence, such as what I’m quite sure was my father’s last backward bicycle ride. It happened at Notre Dame, on a sunny, carefree afternoon, after a pleasing swim in St. Mary’s Lake. Attendant characters, in addition to our protagonist, were my wife, Karina; my brother Dan (since I learned it, I have loved how my choice to include or omit commas indicates that I have only one wife and more than one brother); my four children—Pato, Adi, Sara, and Dani (who rode in a seat contraption on the back of her namesake uncle’s bike)—and I (riding tandem with Adi). We borrowed the bikes from the dormitory that operates as a hotel for alumni each summer. Dad and Dan (and Dani) were up ahead with Pato, impatient with Sara’s training-wheeled meandering. That left the rest of us back there in the shade, making slow progress amid the dirt and gravel, across small washouts and gullies, along the circular trail that rings the lake. As we crested the insubstantial hill into the vertical sunlight, I gathered in an almost-instantaneous scene: My brother paused and smiling at an island in the parking lot, holding the back-heavy bike holding Dani; my son lost somewhere among the scattered cars; my father sitting on his handlebars and facing his seat, feet on the pedals, neck craned, head turned toward me but eyes peripherating the path behind his back. He is headed toward a curb, moving too fast, turning not enough to avoid a collision. As the electric impulses zip from my eyes to my brain to my mouth to shout “Dad!” his front wheel jumps up and jerks right (his left) just onto the border grass and into the octagonal base of a light pole. Momentum is enemy; ballast is imbalance; a man set on his rump above the front wheel means only one thing: a glancing carom off the pole, the back wheel shooting up, my father twisting to brace his headlong tumble to the street below. But the bike is six inches above the asphalt, on the grass. His hands miss the soft turf by a horizontal six inches, so his head crashes helmetless to the street, crumpling under the accelerated weight of his body and the metallic contraption that traps his feet and legs.
     In a second, Dan and I were at his side, helping him up, assessing his injuries. He got to his feet easily enough, if a bit groggily, blinkingly, behind his scratched glasses a slow trickle of blood, on his upper lip a raw exposed layer of skin. We left the bike where it lay and held his hands to show him to a nearby bench, to sit and think on the event. Already the children and Karina were with us, the former on the verge of tears, the latter on the verge of laughter. A red-haired woman who saw the whole thing asked, obligedly, “Are you okay?” My father mumbled an affirmative, and she continued past. I made the group’s first attempt at lightening the gravitas: “She’s thinking, ‘Are you okay, you idiot?’”
     Dad perked up, “She said that?”
     “No,” I said, immediately regretting my move but forced to follow through, “but she must be thinking it.” I thought to check his hearing when I got the chance.
     Our own questions weren’t much more profound than the woman’s, but we were persistent, making sure he’d kept his bearings and didn’t feel too pained or otherwise untoward. He stood up well under our scrutiny, though Dan, gently removing Dad’s glasses, noticed a pulsing gash in the folds above his left eye.
     Perhaps this was a moment to consider mortality, to imagine the world without my father, but our conversation was a mixture of immediate plans and gentle ribbing. Dad wanted to be sure the borrowed bike wasn’t noticeably damaged, so he announced his plans to ride it back to the dorm. Dan, keen to try out a role reversal, caught his words and remonished, “Ride it back, not backward.” He and Karina snickered, while I, ashamed of my prior failed attempt at humor, tried to remain stoic. Karina assuaged the children’s contagious crying with shushes and whispers that “Grandpa’s going to be fine.” They didn’t believe her.
     But he was fine, all things considered, and so was the bike, so he did ride away, soon enough, with the rest of us alongside and behind, as he made it back to the dorm, then continued on to the hospital, where he omitted the “backward” detail in his explanation and found that he’d fractured his skull, an untreatable misfortune (stay out of the boxing ring is about all you can do for it), and then, in the coming days, traveled on to Milwaukee, his boyhood home, where a handful of cousins would relish his tale for its pure ridiculability.
     For as long as I have known my father, he has talked about the summer projects that he and his friends would take on: juggling, walking on their hands, riding their bikes backward. I tried it all but mastered only a fraction of his feats and never quite got the balance and rhythm to ride my bike sitting on my handlebars. This was yet one more way in which I would never be my father’s equal. So it was a mix of sadness and pride that I felt, later, when reminiscing with my wife and brother, to have witnessed Dad’s last backward ride, the exclamation point ending that particular thread of his life.
     I might have expected that I would twist out of my stories into braided meditations as soon as I set off to narrate, that I would, one might say, unzip from the constraints of chronicle into confabulation. It is a mode, I hope, not utterly unpleasant, as it gives both a recounting of events and an attempt at an ordering not only of chronologies but, as Lukacs says, of “souls and destinies.” God rest us both, my father and me, long into the hereafter, of course, but now, too, for brief snatches of peace amid all our self-created chaos, our ineluctable destinies of descent and decay.


*


One of the fascinating things about last happenings is how seldom we recognize them or even remember them. With the now-middle-aged kids I grew up with, I often think nostalgically (on Facebook, mostly) about our idyllic childhood and how we never knew we were playing our last game of manhunt or building our last fort in the woods or jumping our bikes over each other for the last time. But all those things came to an end at some point, and we didn't think to lament their passing until much later. For this essay, the proximate occasion (noticing my zipper had been down all morning) gave rise to that line of thinking for insignificant things, which then brought me to what I was certain was the last time my father rode a bike backwards, which, because he was injured (not seriously) and some decades older than me, got me thinking about the inevitability of death and the irreversability of decay. Samuel Johnson showed up conveniently in my reading and provided an epigraph, and all that was left was some polishing and threading to make the essay seem whole.

Patrick Madden's newest essay collection is Recenses/Recencies (11/1/26), and he also wrote Disparates (2020), Sublime Physick (2016) and Quotidiana (2010). He co-edited Fourth Genre: 25 Essays from Our First 25 Years (2025) and After Montaigne: Contemporary Essayists Cover the Essays (2015) and co-translated the Selected Poems of Eduardo Milán (2012). He is co-editor of the 21st Century Essays series at Ohio State University Press, co-editor of the literary journal Fourth Genre, and vice president of the NonfictioNOW Conference.

This essay originally appeared in Sublime Physick (2016).

Monday, August 24, 2026

Timothy Dyke, Lest List | L*STS

  


*

Lest List

Timothy Dyke

*

L*STS: an Essay Daily Happening | About & Contents

 Lists | Lasts | Losts | Lusts | Lests

*


lest I come across as arrogant

lest I remind him of the time he crashed my VW bug

lest he retreats to demon metaphors

lest the reference to palm forests triggers the Merwin digression

lest I misunderstood the assignment

lest she asks me for the hundredth time if I’m seeing anyone

lest he drops to his knees and starts praying for my salvation

lest they are out of lavender syrup

lest we accidentally run into each other in Safeway

lest anyone accuses me of using A.I.

lest it was the 50 mg and not the 10 mg

lest I am overcome by spiders

lest I am ever expected to compose a sonnet

lest they ask me to join their affinity group

lest proclamation of love becomes mistaken for act of love

lest you confuse Neil Diamond with Neil Sadaka 

lest you confuse Naomi Klein with Naomi Wolf

lest you confuse the Chris in the Star Trek movie

with the Chris in the Guardians of the Galaxy movie

lest this turns into one of those grief sessions where 

we are expected to hug and share feelings


*


When I heard of the L*ST publication project, I knew I wanted to participate. I am drawn, as a reader and writer, to lists and to wordplay. I could not stop thinking about how versatile that L*ST construction is, and as I started replacing that asterisk with vowels, my brain zeroed in on the word, “lest.” It seemed to offer some potential for creating something interesting. What did the word mean exactly? I looked it up on dictionary.com: “for fear that.” I was inspired that a list of lests could imply a list of fears, trepidations, and dreaded outcomes. I immediately began working on my lest list. The sample dictionary sentence was: “He kept his notes by his side, lest faulty memory lead him astray.” If I couldn’t read the independent clause that comes before the comma, I would wonder what preceded the lest. I like that act of wondering. In my list, I have only supplied the clause that follows the lest. I will leave it to readers to imagine what comes before.

Timothy Dyke is a writer and teacher living in Honolulu, HI. His memoir, Backbends, was published by High Frequency Press in 2025. High Frequency Press will publish Century of Empathy, his hybrid work of autofiction, in late 2026.


Friday, August 21, 2026

Jessica Curry, Wannabe | L*STS

  


*

Wannabe

Jessica Curry

*

L*STS: an Essay Daily Happening | About & Contents

 Lists | Lasts | Losts | Lusts | Other

*


I want to be as cool as Charlotte Gainsbourg

I want to be as sexy as Sophia Loren

I want to be as profound as Emily Dickinson

I want to be as impassive as Zadie Smith

I want to be as elegant as Kristen Scott Thomas

I want to be as tiny as Sarah Jessica Parker

I want to be as radical as Mary Wollstonecraft

I want to be as loveable as Claire Danes

I want to be as funny as Maya Rudolph

I want to be as beautiful as Rachel Weisz

I want to be as sharp-witted as Nora Ephron

I want to be as heartfelt as Joni Mitchell

I want to be as impressive as Maya Angelou

I want to be as devastating as Carrie Fisher

I want to be as wise as Elizabeth Barrett Browning

I want to be as charming as Maggie Aderin-Pocock

I want to be as chic as Katherine Hepburn

I want to be as rock and roll as Miki Berenyi

I want to be as defiant as Rosa Parks

I want to be as cheeky as Lou Sanders

I want to be as influential as Ruth Bader Ginsburg

I want to be as positive as Isabelle Allende

I want to be as elliptical as Deborah Levy

I want to be as hip as Kathryn Hahn

I want to be as brave as Harriet Tubman

I want to be as iconic as Frida Kahlo

I want to be as unwavering as Eleanor Roosevelt

I want to be as blonde as Cameron Diaz

I want to be as fierce as Virginia Woolf

What is a little bit sad is that I very rarely want to be me. 


*


I am a huge writer of lists, and love reading other peoples’, too. I was very depressed during the Pandemic and when I was finally starting to be able to function again I started making lists in my diary to inject some structure into my day. This list from 2022 was born from my remembering an absolutely hilarious song from Crazy Ex-Girlfriend, where she sings about the intensity of girl crushes: “I wanna kill you and wear your skin like a dress, but then also have you see me in the dress.” Chef’s kiss. My list questions why we can feel this beautiful—bordering on obsessional—appreciation of other women, but are so rarely able to harness that love and reverence for ourselves. The title, Wannabe, is homage to the ultimate lady bosses, The Spice Girls. 

Jessica Curry is a BAFTA-winning composer, writer, game developer and broadcaster. She was co-founder of internationally acclaimed game studio The Chinese Room and her music has been performed around the world. She started writing in earnest during the pandemic as an accompaniment to her latest album, Shielding Songs. Her work draws on themes of disability, feminism, culture and the peculiarities of modern life. Her first non-fiction work, How to Deal With Everything We Lose, was published by Calque Press earlier this year. 


Wednesday, August 19, 2026

Misha Tenster, On Birds and Poison | L*STS


*

On Birds and Poison

Misha Tentser

*

L*STS: an Essay Daily Happening | About & Contents

 Lists | Lasts | Losts | Lusts | Other

*


Saturday morning, Beth called to ask if I wanted to go birding at the wildlife refuge west of Syracuse. Beth was the elderly landlady of my hovel, where I drank until my vision fuzzed. I didn’t set anything on fire or host raucous parties. I sat crisscross on my bed and turned my misery inward, which demanded plastic jugs of Kentucky Deluxe from the corner liquor store. A boy-faced man named Ralph owned and operated the liquor store, the last extant business in a strip mall on the city’s West Side. 

Beth didn’t know about my drinking, which I preferred. When she called, I thought it’d be more suspicious if I declined. So she scooped me up in her Jetta booming Hall & Oates’ “Crime Pays” and zoomed the back roads to the refuge. In her car, the AC wheezed, pumping sticky August air flavored with mango freshener. I was drunk enough to imagine the wispy clouds on the horizon as smoke tendrils from God’s curly pipe. I wasn’t drunk enough to feel like a subject of the divine. 

Beth explained the cardinal birding rule, that the birds’ wellbeing came before the birder’s desire to photograph, record, or gawk. I’d never birded with rules before. Last summer, I’d spotted a crow on its side, motionless in the grass at a park across from the Erie Canal. I dribbled some water onto its beak to confirm its aliveness. The crow’s eyes moved slowly in their sockets. 

Beth parked. She and I ambled down a board walk overlooking a swamp packed with geese. We sat down on a bench. Beth pulled binoculars from her bag and searched the landscape for a juicier character like an eagle or heron. Too hot for them today, she said. What do we do? I asked. Nothing, she said, wait. 

I felt Hall’s baritone and synths bounce around my skull. I watched the geese preen and wiggle their necks. I recalled picnicking with my parents by a scummy pond, where a goose mom chased me and bit my butt cheek. I was six and unacquainted with keeping my distance. The goose bite bloomed into a royal welt, which I showed off at school in the boy’s bathroom for my friends. Every time I saw a goose since then, my butt cheek stung in recognition.

I thought my drunkenness might wane after forty minutes of sitting with Beth. Instead, it rippled into my extremities, which started to spasm. I tucked my hands into my jean pockets, but my lips pulsed. Beth stared out at the swamp. 

After three years of sobriety, I’d convinced myself I could drink casually. I started again with good bourbon, which delivered a warm burn to my esophagus. Eventually, the burn disappeared and I couldn’t afford the fancy whiskey regularly. I didn’t understand what precipitated my desire to drink again. A relapse of malaise, maybe. A desire to self-sedate? 

You ok? Beth asked. Yes… I said, it’s lush. And it was. Sun beamed through the cirrus clouds onto water lilies and shrubs, whose green extended as far as I could see. Willows drooped into the swamp, as if bowing to the water. It’s true, she said. She packed away her binoculars and we walked back to her car.

On the drive home, groves of trees shot past us on the country road. At home, I waited by the window until I saw Beth’s car pull away, then walked to the liquor store. I wanted to bask in the cool air and wine fridge lights. The fridge’s glow beamed onto my hand skin and exposed my winding nerves. The wine called to me. The whiskey did too. I stared the bottles down until they blurred and danced. 

Ralph didn’t watch me linger. He watched a horse race on his phone and twirled his mustache hairs. I considered buying some shooters and drinking in the park, beside the aqueduct where ducks gathered. But Ralph’s face, soft and oval, gleamed like my mom’s. I bought a single scratch-off. On Ralph’s t-shirt, an embroidered golden eagle head stared me down.

I wondered about flight. One spring, when I flew to Syracuse in a tiny Cessna, the pilot pointed out a skein of sandhill cranes soaring beside the plane. I was concerned the cranes would get sucked into the Cessna’s propeller, but they glided gracefully, then vanished. I didn’t know when, precisely, the birds merged with the night, or if they took a left turn towards some wetlands to rest, then nest. From my window, the cranes looked like bloodied arrows.

My apartment’s porch steps creaked under my sneakers. By the front door, I sat in the rocking chair left behind by the previous tenant. The chair’s frayed cane poked my glutes. Cars rumbled down my street and sizzling garlic scent wafted from a neighbor’s open kitchen window. Sweat gathered in the ditches of my knees. I scratched the tinny lotto film with a quarter until the symbols came into focus. I won nothing. I kept scratching until the symbols faded too. 


*


This essay is about the last morning I drank booze, two and a half years ago. I don’t have a soft spot for birds or landlords, but I value the suggestion that attentiveness is an act of generosity towards self and others. My current apartment in Syracuse has gorgeous, tall windows. From my desk, I’ve seen groundhogs, cardinals, possums, and a skunk. The skunk was the size of a kid’s tricycle. I think he was benevolent.

Misha Tentser is a poet from Tucson, Arizona. His poems and essays have appeared in Puerto del Sol, The Adroit Journal, Yalobusha Review, and on North Country Public Radio. Misha's first book, American Loon, is forthcoming from Burnside Review Press in 2027. He teaches writing in Syracuse, New York. 




Monday, August 17, 2026

Erin Keane, State Fair Vanitas | L*STS


*

 State Fair Vanitas

Erin Keane

*

L*STS: an Essay Daily Happening | About & Contents

 Lists | Lasts | Losts | Lusts | Other

*

 

Yes, yes, to fried everything on a stick, to the duckling slide and the poster with the ten-point plan defending the ducklings’ dignity, to the hired-out Pirate Ship and the Tilt-a-Whirl’s impeccable lettering and questionable gears; yes to a roasted ear of Frankencorn, to a pork butt sandwich dripping with grease; yes to the overfed, pampered pumpkins waiting to shock us all at weigh-in, yes to 4-H tobacco, dark stripped or burley, to quilts too beautiful to throw on the bed, to the sheep in their couture gowns, the goats lost in perverse thoughts, and the pigs, the pigs, who could say no to their downy bellies heaving in the barn-dank, straw-scattered air? And especially yes to the culinary wing on the final weekend, when the lemon tassies and meringue-topped pies and hummingbird bundt cakes with cream cheese glaze have spontaneously sprouted their own personal crops, soft green mold patches furring across slumped-in sides. Give me decay on display, blue-ribbon proud. Yes, yes, we know it’s all in vain, but yes to being here anyway, whether we take Best in Show or die trying. 


*


I love the Kentucky State Fair, which I think comes through pretty clearly in this piece. There’s an overwhelming sensory assault that comes from combining a carnival, a flea market, and an agricultural competition in one space that I can’t help but respond to. I love the excessive food, of course, but also how the farm families showing livestock set up camp next to their prize animals, and how amateur gardeners, bakers, cooks, and crafters are competing just as fiercely for a ribbon and, like, a five-dollar prize. And my absolute favorite time to go to the Fair is later in the run, when the food exhibits have started to develop mold but are still on display. It’s gross in a very compelling way. I started this list knowing I wanted to end up in the culinary wing with the mold, hoping to write my way to understanding why I derive such delight from the ruined foods left out in the cases for us to admire. In the vanitas subgenre of still life paintings, human skulls and other transient objects are included to remind the viewer of the certainty of death (one of my favorite fixations) and to scold us about worldly pursuits—their idea is that in the end, all our petty little pursuits will have been in vain. This list is my answer to that: Of course we’re gonna die anyway. Of course the blue-ribbon cake is a temporary pleasure. Of course the hours of baking practice put into developing a contender for the prize can all add up to nothing in the end. But it feels good to make something intentional out of the chaos of ingredients, environment, and form, and it feels great when you surprise yourself with the result. It’s worth celebrating the choice to create instead of despairing. Nothing we do with intention and pleasure can possibly be in vain, even if we never win the big prize or leave a legacy that sustains across centuries. In a recent poetry workshop, one of my students identified a poem not labeled explicitly as an ars poetica, and I heard myself saying, maybe every poem is secretly an ars poetica, essentially making its own case for why we write in the first place. Maybe this list is one, too.  

Erin Keane is the author of three collections of poetry and the memoir RUNAWAY: Notes on the Myths That Made Me, named one of NPR's best books of 2022. She teaches poetry and creative nonfiction in the Naslund-Mann MFA program at Spalding University and is Chief Content Officer at Salon.com. New poems are forthcoming in North American Review, Indianapolis Review, Solid State, and Forget Cool. Her recent writing can be found at HAD, Necessary Fiction, Essay Daily, MarchXness.com, and in the anthologies HIT REPEAT UNTIL I HATE MUSIC: The March Xness Anthology (Split/Lip Press) and ONCE A CITY SAID (Sarabande Books). 



Wednesday, August 12, 2026

Scott F. Parker, No God but God: Notes Toward the Essay as Unknowing

Learning means learning what cannot be learned; practicing means practicing what cannot be practiced; discriminating means discriminating what cannot be discriminated. Understanding that rests in what it cannot understand is the finest. If you do not attain this goal, then Heaven the Equalizer will destroy you.
—Zhuangzi

Here I am once again digging into the dirt of self. It is for me a life’s work.

The essay, as I read it in the Montaignian tradition, begins in ignorance: “If a subject is unfamiliar to me, for that very reason I essay it.” With this ars essayica implying its converse: If a subject is familiar, I do not.

Isn’t an essay simultaneously an expression and interrogation of the self? According to Virginia Woolf, “Almost all essays begin with a capital—‘I think’, ‘I feel’,” and achieve “permanent value” according to their authors’ courage to “write of themselves.”

There is a paradox inherent to the essay form. The genre of the self, the essay is bound by the limits of self-reference such that the articulating self is itself inarticulable. The subject (I) is the only subject unsayable, the only subject unessayable. Yet the elusiveness of the self is what draws the essayist ever forward on the page.

Like the self it discloses and fails to disclose, the essay is inherently imperfect and imperfectible, chronically incomplete. Indeed, its virtue is its imperfect peculiarity. Meet a consciousness in its pages, never Consciousness.

But those limits, broad as they may be, exhaust themselves. The essayist, constantly disclosing, constantly discloses thereby the limits of disclosure. Beyond the essay, silence looms; beyond the self, the very world.

Writing, I come to know myself better, never in full. Therefore, I go on essaying myself, perhaps, to be.

If I keep Woolf’s council here, I must confess that while I don’t have my autobiographical I in mind but the essayistic I that is the name of subjectivity, I nevertheless have my own unique conception of this essayistic I, one no doubt born of innate characteristics, personal history, circumstance, and whatever contingencies else.

Taking a perspective, an essay is a form of thought. Whose? I go on thinking, even without insight into the origin of thought.

Yes, the essay begins in ignorance. Doesn’t it end there, too? Essaying a subject reveals the impossibility of concluding it.

“That for which we find words is already dead in our hearts,” Nietzsche tells us. “There is always a kind of contempt in the act of speaking.”

Only the unthought thought is worth thinking; only the unwritten essay worth writing.

We venture into the unknown a breath at a time, pursuing the essay to the ends of its conception before trailing off in silence.

Que sais-je? If pressed, as the essay presses: not a lot, very little, almost nothing.

Call it the Yessay, call it the Sayessay. We embrace what is, even at the limit of our powers of conception, even beyond.

Philosophy for the Greeks was a form of spiritual practice, a way of transforming the self through the discipline of critical reflection. Having long abdicated this purpose, philosophy sees itself reborn in the form of the essay.

The philosophers I love most are those from Plato to Wittgenstein who most resemble essayists: Berkeley and Hume, Emerson and Thoreau, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche.

Because the subject of the essay is the full expanse of the human mind, living essayistically means living at the boundaries of thought. With each discovery of new territory for thinking, simultaneously the corresponding discovery of a new thinker.

The essayist finds it possible to do philosophy in solitude, the blank page serving as the necessary other, the dialectic playing out between parts of the self. Thought thinking against itself the way Socrates thinks against his conversation partners. Partners, yes: it is a performance. The audience may be forgotten, but the audience remains.

To think out loud in the form of an essay is to perform thought as one would give a lecture consisting entirely of questions, none of them rhetorical. Who am I? What matters? How shall I live?

The questions are perennial; the answers are provisional. Each of us must write our own essays.

Montaigne: “I have no more created my book, than my book has created me.” Emerson (on Montaigne): “Cut these words and they would bleed.” But just as we write ourselves into being so too do we write ourselves out.

During pure concentration, writing becomes a form of prayer. The self, absorbed in its activity, loses itself in God.

Somehow, when I am least intelligible to myself is precisely when I experience myself as most truly who I am. What I am doing in such moments, I would have a hard time articulating, only that it is right right right as rain.

“The Tao that can be named is not the eternal Tao.” “No imagination can conceive of Him, nor can any understanding fathom Him.” The essayist, in his own way, converges with the wisdom traditions; his path, the path of contemplation. He discovers for himself that any thought pursued to its limit dissolves into silence as thinking exhausts itself, the object of attempted thought remaining unthought.

Does the essayist believe in God? No, the essayist doesn’t believe; the essayist essays. And God is. The rest is details, and details are where the essayist thrives, the tangibles by which he sketches the intangible, saying in relief what cannot otherwise be said, saying in silence what has no sound.

Would I be reading too much into the form if I wondered whether every essay is a devotional to God?

So often writing is discussed as a practice like other practices—yoga, meditation, running, say: in each of these, the activity brings (can bring) a particular quality of absorption that leads me beyond myself.

The only way out is through. The liberation from the self is achieved by the turn deeper into self.

Essays, David Lazar writes, “are so hopelessly, or better yet, hopefully, self-reflexive.” If thinking entails thinking about thinking and so on, n+1, before long the essayist draws a blank.

We study the self as a means of transcending it.

Blake: “If the fool would persist in his folly, he would become wise.”

Torah as the interpretation of Torah, philosophy as criticism of philosophy, essay as ars essayica: in each case, the practice transforms the practitioner. The theologian, the philosopher, the essayist, each arriving at aporia finds no one arrives.

The essayist as disciple of Thomas: “If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you. If you do not bring forth what is within you, what you do not bring forth will destroy you.” He takes kenosis literally, emptying himself one thought at a time.

Neti neti leading toward the inexpressible absolute, the apophatic center around which all these words orbit.

Essaying, then, as a kind of monastic practice that can be entered into an hour at a time.

Insofar as I’m in a position to say, essaying is in my nature. Beginning in doubt, I proceed toward unknowing, and in the effort align my being with being. Through my unknowing I come to know myself as the unknower, as the unknown.

That which cannot be thought needn’t be unthought.

Until then: the thought is thought; the thought is doubted; the doubt is doubted. Eventually both thought and doubt dissolve into silence without opposite, and consciousness enters the realm of the uncontrasted, the unconceived.

What sounds like confidence is only the sound of a thought thinking itself. Essays humble me. Through them—through the process of composing them—I submit myself unfailingly to the unknown, the unknowable. (It must be a poor essayist who imagines his subject could ever fit itself to his prose.)

In pursuing thought to its end, the essayist makes of himself a being toward silence. Only beyond the limit of thought do we encounter wonder and awe, in the face of which the only thing to say, if something must be said, is, as the Muslims have it, La ilaha illa Allah.

*

Scott F. Parker is the author of Teaching Without Teaching and the editor of Conversations with Joan Didion, among other books. His writing has appeared in Philosophy Now, Tin House, The Believer, and other publications.

Tuesday, February 24, 2026

Avery Gregurich, Seeking: Max Headroom

 

This essay is in our Media Club series, an ongoing series of essays on visual media. Pitch us something! More details here.


*

Seeking: Max Headroom

Avery Gregurich

*


Max Headroom first found me the way that God always intended: inside my television, hiding out on Tubi. This was not more than a month ago. When I say that Max Headroom found me, I mean Max Headroom, the 1987 American TV show. I don't know what I mean when I say God.
     It’s important to work in specifics when thinking about Max. For a brief stretch there in the late 80s, he was everywhere. Billed as the world’s first “AI” TV show host, Max Headroom began as the British response to MTV veejays. On The Max Headroom Show, he spammed episodes, popping up between music videos and trolling viewers with fake advertisements, celebrity impressions, and other imagined soliloquies from a completely “computer-generated” person.
     Max got three different TV shows in total, some New Coke ads, an appearance on Letterman, plus his own Christmas special, Max Headroom's Giant Christmas Turkey. Somehow, I had missed Max entirely, all of it, including the TV broadcast hijackings that bear his name: the Max Headroom Incidents. 

&

On the night of November 22, 1987, the broadcast signal of Chicago’s WGN-TV was hijacked by what the papers later called “television pirates.” During highlights of that afternoon’s Bears victory over the Detroit Lions, the signal cut to video of a person swaying back and forth in front of a twisting metal screen, wearing an oversized plastic Max Headroom mask. 
     If Max was speaking, it didn’t make it into the broadcast. Back and forth he went, swaying for about a half a minute, rocking back forth amongst waves of errant static. Then the video signal rippled, cut to black as engineers at WGN regained control of the broadcast. After, sportscaster Dan Roan appeared standing behind the Sports Desk next to a graphic of a football that said “BEARS BONUS”.
     "Well, if you're wondering what's happened, so am I,” he said. “Actually, the computer we have running our news from time to time took off and went wild, so what we are going to do is start over from the top of the Bears and tell you once again about the 30 to 10 victory they had…"
     Approximately two hours after the initial broadcast signal attack, the hijackers targeted a second Chicago television network. During the middle of a public television broadcast of Doctor Who: Horror of Fang Rock, Max Headroom appeared again. This time he spoke.
     For around two minutes, Max Headroom delivers a series of non sequiturs with a panicked, semi-human voice. “Catch the wave!” he says and throws a can of Coke down, out of frame. He sings a line from The Temptations’ “(I Know) I’m Losing You” and hums the Clutch Cargo theme song. “I just made a giant masterpiece for all the greatest world newspaper nerds!” the person in the Max Headroom mask says near the end. The signal cuts back to Dr. Who just as a woman begins hitting Max Headroom’s bare ass with a fly swatter.
     The broadcast was terminated by the hijackers themselves.
     No arrests have ever been made in the case, and no suspects have ever been named. 

&

How is it that we’ve made it here to the age of artificial intelligence realized, and Max Headroom is not around? 
     I’ve spent the holiday season switching back and forth between the hijacking footage and Max Headroom. I’ve written “WHERE IS MAX HEADROOM?” across the top of several different pages of a notebook, and taken very serious notes toward finding an answer. I started watching videos analyzing the transcript of the hijackings. Right now, my algorithms are actively working to feed me more Max. Instagram reels. Youtube videos. A targeted ad for an A.I. Max Headroom voice changer. Watching the show, I tried to steady myself with hack synopsis and trivial details. The usual suspects.
     As the weeks went on, I kept waiting for Max Headroom to mean more. To me, or the current moment, or to whatever it is that causes us to still do this. I’m sure that when it’s done right, essaying can look like a manic form of prayer. Hours spent (still) staring at screens, but now it’s been given a purpose. To craft an account that attempts to corral and mark our virtual wandering. A human life lived as a language learning model.

&

Max Headroom begins in total snowstorm static. Then, scenes from a broken city. Skyscrapers rise in the distance. A chyron appears: 20 MINUTES INTO THE FUTURE. Cut to a newsroom in full production panic, calling out to their reporter in the field, a man with a camera who’s delivered onto the scene via helicopter. Hanging out the side of the news chopper, he turns the lens towards his face and goes “live and direct,” staring straight down the barrel and holding the camera on himself.
     “This is Edison Carter, answering the questions other people are afraid to ask and what I want to know is this…”
     The pilot, “Blipverts,” is a remake of the original bit of Max Headroom media, the 1985 British TV movie, Max Headroom: 20 Minutes into the Future. 
     
Turns out that Max Headroom isn’t really about Max Headroom at all. It’s about his human component, Edison Carter, a man presented throughout the series as somehow both a rogue, fearless truth-seeker and the media conglomerate’s biggest star. In the pilot, Carter’s story gets pulled after he starts investigating his own network’s latest advertising technology, “blipverts”, or concentrated television ads that can sometimes cause viewers’ bodies to explode.
     While attempting to escape from Network 23 headquarters, Carter is thrown off a motorcycle and his head collides with a parking gate. Blood drips from the dented metal reading “MAX HEADROOM.” In order to find out what Carter has seen, the television network decides to feed a floppy disk Carter's consciousness into a computer. 
     Out comes Max Headroom, an A.I. construct of Carter, desperately reaching for language and wearing a tie. Carter survives the motorcycle crash, and using the memories stored in Max Headroom, exposes the network’s use of “blipverts.”
     With its sci-fi camp and cyberpunk weirdness, the show predicted a future that sure looks a lot like this one, a dystopia wrought from convenience and corporate greed, and defined by artificial intelligence, corporate journalism, digital surveillance, and the inevitable merger of technology and humanity. Heavy stuff for major network television in 1987. The show didn’t stand a chance against Alf or Dallas or Miami Vice. At the end of the year, Max Headroom landed at 101st in the ratings. It ran fourteen episodes in all. and only two of them aired after the Max Headroom Incidents.

&

I am wondering why the Max Headroom hijackers have never come forward. Why they have never been found. If anyone else is still even looking for them.
     The Max Headroom Incidents were the last in a trio of high profile television hijackings during the late 80s, all of which happened during the peak of Max Headroom’s popularity. The first happened during an episode of The Falcon and the Snowman. At 12:32 A.M., HBO’s satellite was hacked by a person calling themselves "Captain Midnight." His grievance was clear, prescient still.
     The second happened two months before the Max Headroom Incidents, when a porno playing on the Playboy Channel was interrupted by a bible verse: "Thus sayeth the Lord thy God: Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy. Repent for the kingdom of Heaven is at hand.
     Suspects were identified and arrests were made in both cases. Captain Midnight was identified as John R. MacDougall, a satellite dish salesman who viewed the hack as a protest against HBO’s high subscription prices, which he cited as ruining his business. At the time of the hijacking, he was working a second job as a master control operator at a satellite teleport, and hacked the signal from there.
     Thomas Haynie was of course an employee of the Christian Broadcasting Network, and shared his selection of scripture from Exodus and Matthew while working as a satellite uplink engineer. Along with the Playboy Channel, Haynie was also charged with hijacking the American Exxxtasy channel the same night, charges that were eventually dropped. The pair were each sentenced to probation, a few thousand dollars in fines, and community service. Which makes me wonder why the Max Headroom hijackers have never come forward.
     The statute of limitations expired back in 1992. Their Wikipedia page takes special care to say that the people “responsible for the intrusion would no longer face criminal punishment should their identities be revealed.”
     There’s an element of youth to all of it, the idea itself and the construction of a set and sculpting of a Max Headroom mask and of course the bare ass and flyswatter, which in my head places those responsible in their mid-to-late 60s today. Given the pattern, it’s probably some one or several people who worked in satellite broadcasting in the greater Chicago area in 1987. I’d measure it a major success of my life, being able to track these people down and ask them why they did it.

&

Near the end of the pilot, Edison Carter meets Max Headroom, his digital self. It’s played to be a moment of pure wonder, serene and profound. And who amongst us wouldn’t want to meet ourselves, to look them in the eye and ask them what it's like to be inside the screen?
     Part of essaying I think is seeing prophecy in old television shows. It almost seems quaint to say, but Max Headroom warned us about how much of our lives would occur digitally, online and disembodied. Individual realities constructed by algorithms. Max’s disappearance and subsequent absence from the larger culture feels purposeful.
     Still, you can find pieces of Max Headroom all around. When Netflix tries to buy Warner Bros., Max Headroom is there, hiding somewhere in the paperwork. Max is there when major TV networks partner with a gambling site to overlay betting odds on live news events. And Max Headroom is certainly there when Tubi runs an ad for ChatGPT while you watch episodes of Max Headroom. 
     
I wonder how long now I’ll be followed by both Max Headrooms, whether it’ll be tomorrow or a year from now when I’m prompted again to remember both the character and the broadcast hijacker. A TV show reboot was announced a few years ago, so there’s still hope that they will ruin Max yet.
     “What happened to the old religions?” Edison Carter asks his producer Murray halfway through the series.
     “I don't know,” Murray says. “Television killed it. We have better miracles.”


&&&


Avery Gregurich lives and writes in eastern Iowa, and organizes The Out Of Towners Reading Series.