It’s 4:44 in the morning. My head’s hammered
with allergies and I have a deadline. I need to write this essay about the nine
semesters I spent editing Nonfiction for Ninth
Letter, or maybe I should be making a point about something specific via
one of the essays I edited (which one? pick me, pick me), except that I didn’t
edit so much as, with the help of a new assistant editor each issue, I
co-managed revolving bodies of MFA students who, because human, had different
tastes, interests, personalities, affiliations, and exhibited varying degrees
of preparedness and investment in the genre. In short, we were a team, except
that we were a different team each time, except when we weren’t. And what we
produced as an editorial body of many minds was not predictable. Maybe the best
example of that came in the last issue.
In “When My Muse was Young,” Nicholas Delbanco
delivers a long, rich lecture that runs from W. B. Yeats and Franz Liszt
through Georgia O’Keeffe. Here’s a snippet, the last two sentences, to give you
an idea:
She was still at work in
her nineties, but the years did take their toll, and the blind lame visionary
who scrawled her signature on codicils leaving more and more to Hamilton was no longer
self-sufficient. Black Rock with Blue Sky
and White Clouds, painted in 1972 before she lost her eyesight, is one of
the last completed oils and rife with the old mystery--yet what it portends is
unclear.
On the opposing, similarly and wildly colored
page (wild for publishing anyway) sits the opening of Brian Oliu’s captivating
and enigmatic “siren(1).exe”:
C:\run
thelxiope.exe
This
program cannot be run until SCOPULI.EXE is installed. Install now? (Y/N) N
byebye
C:\
C:\run
molpe.exe
This
program cannot be run until SCOPULI.EXE is installed. Install now? (Y/N) Y
byebye
Initializing
SCOPULI.EXE...
CAUTION!!
RUNNING THIS PROGRAM MAY CAUSE SYSTEM TO BECOME UNSTABLE. CONTINUE? (Y/N) Y
Installing...
Say what? Will the real Ninth Letter please stand up? (Psst. There is no real Ninth Letter.) I served as Nonfiction
Editor for Volumes 2-5 (or Issues 3-10) and stepped off the editing platform
with 6.1 (or Issue 11), co-edited with Audrey Petty, in the bag. I’m now back
at it for what will become Issue 22 (or 11.2, AKA Fall/Winter 2014). I’m not
here, though, to yak about what will be (who knows?) in this next issue or the
ten issues (6.2-11.1) I had nothing to do with. I’m here to say the sun’s doing
its dawn thing out on the Atlantic and my face is right here in central
Illinois clenching like a fist against allergies as I’m doing well to remember
most of the sixty or so essays we must have published during my first shift.
And it was, for me, a great run. While I missed the birthing and bottle-feeding
of Ninth Letter in that first volume
year as well as the planning that preceded and produced it, I got to be there
for its formative years. I sat in the meetings that brought together in one
room professors from Creative Writing and Art & Design, who insured its
investment in interdisciplinarity. I remember a meeting or two in which we were
anxious parents who didn’t agree. And in the editorial meetings that featured
the Delbanco and Oliu pieces, we didn’t agree.
But that’s the way, or should be, that things
get done. No one needs to feel passionately in favor of every piece, but every
piece should enjoy passionate support. That said, I heard in a meeting
yesterday that people still walk up to the Ninth
Letter table at AWP and explain their reluctance to submit as a reaction to
our interest in, or preoccupation with, cutting-edge texts. I imagine what they’re
responding to is not text but design. And what does cutting-edge mean anyway?
Consistent deliverance of new technique? Fresh content areas served on
shape-shifting plates visible only under special lamps or old content made
fresh by hiply bringing its naughtiness or unspeakability into the light? Shit
so new it will reinvent stink? I find the cutting-edge remark bothersome
because I don’t believe it’s true. I believe that while we published on my
shift an occasional nonfiction piece that pushed one or both of the envelopes,
content and form, to the far edge of the table, there were four or five
Delbancos for every Oliu or Elena Passarello (see “Kareninas” in 4.1), by which
I mean essays like Nicole Walker’s “Where the Wild Things Are” (available just
after the Passarello in 4.1) that gradually and often gorgeously reveal their
meaning in fairly traditional ways. I believe we published the best essays, by
which I mean the ones that managed to make their way through slush and into the
many minds that filled the editing room, found sufficient passion and
admiration, even if no one of us would have selected the final line-ups. I
believe that’s as good a way as any, by which I mean a sure-fire way to publish
pieces that will resonate and find a home with the right readers.
By which I mean, as the sun starts to hit the
window and coffee is distracting me from my allergies, I don’t see what’s
cutting-edge about that.
Steve
Davenport is the author of two poetry collections: Overpass (2012) and Uncontainable
Noise (2006). His poems, stories, and essays have been anthologized,
reprinted, and published in scores of literary magazines both on-line and in
print. A story in The Southern Review received a 2011 Pushcart Prize
Special Mention. His Murder on Gasoline Lake, published in Black
Warrior Review and later as a chapbook, is listed as Notable in Best
American Essays 2007. His day job is Associate Director of Creative
Writing at the University
of Illinois Urbana-Champaign ,
and he is temporarily back in his old job as Creative Nonfiction Editor of Ninth Letter. He keeps a
website/blog at http://gasolinelake.com/.
No comments:
Post a Comment